Hetzner vs UpCloud
Hetzner vs UpCloud
Hetzner and UpCloud are both infrastructure-focused cloud providers that appeal to developers looking for alternatives to large hyperscale cloud platforms.
Both offer cloud servers, storage, networking, and infrastructure services.
Hetzner is particularly known for cloud and dedicated servers and strong infrastructure value.
UpCloud focuses strongly on cloud servers, storage, performance, and predictable infrastructure management.
For developers choosing between the two, the most important factors are resource requirements, geographic location, pricing, storage, networking, and operational preferences.
- Hetzner
- $50 6 variants
- UpCloud
- $35 1 variant
Hetzner vs UpCloud: Quick Comparison
| Category | Hetzner | UpCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Main Focus | Cloud and dedicated infrastructure | Cloud infrastructure |
| Cloud Servers | Yes | Yes |
| Dedicated Servers | Strong | More limited |
| Object Storage | Yes | Yes |
| Block Storage | Yes | Yes |
| Kubernetes | Supported | UpCloud Kubernetes |
| Infrastructure Control | High | High |
| Performance Focus | Strong | Strong |
| Best Fit | Infrastructure-heavy workloads | Cloud server and storage workloads |
Hetzner and UpCloud accounts, side by side
Every variant and price below is the live listing from our catalog. Add a variant straight to the cart, or open the full product page.
Available variants
- Hetzner 5 Server Limit $50
- Hetzner 10 Server Limit $70
- Hetzner 25 Server Limit $120
- Hetzner 50 Server Limit $250
- Hetzner Open 25 Port $350
- Hetzner 100 Server Limit $650
Hetzner
Hetzner has a strong infrastructure-oriented identity.
Its cloud servers are suitable for websites, APIs, SaaS applications, databases, Docker workloads, and self-hosted services.
One of its biggest advantages is the availability of dedicated servers.
This gives businesses an option when virtual cloud servers are no longer the ideal solution.
UpCloud
UpCloud focuses strongly on cloud infrastructure.
Its cloud servers, storage, networking, and Kubernetes services can support many common application workloads.
UpCloud also emphasizes performance-oriented infrastructure and predictable pricing.
This can be attractive for developers who want a focused cloud platform.
Ease of Use
Both providers are relatively straightforward.
The choice may depend on which infrastructure model fits your team.
Hetzner is particularly attractive to users who want direct control over cloud and dedicated servers.
UpCloud is designed around cloud infrastructure and provides a focused environment for developers.
Pricing
Pricing should be evaluated using equivalent resources.
Compare:
- CPU
- RAM
- Storage
- Network traffic
- Backup
- Database
- Kubernetes
Hetzner is often attractive when raw infrastructure value is the main priority.
UpCloud also emphasizes predictable infrastructure pricing.
UpCloud currently promotes zero-cost outbound traffic under its fair-transfer policy, subject to its terms.
The actual application architecture should always be used for a final cost calculation.
Performance
Both platforms can support production workloads.
Hetzner provides cloud and dedicated infrastructure.
UpCloud emphasizes performance across its cloud server and storage products.
The actual application performance depends on the selected resources and architecture.
For example, a database application may depend heavily on storage performance and memory.
A high-traffic API may be more sensitive to CPU and network latency.
Dedicated Servers
Hetzner has a major advantage for customers who want dedicated physical servers.
UpCloud’s focus is more strongly centered around cloud infrastructure.
If your application requires dedicated hardware, Hetzner may therefore be the more suitable choice.
If you prefer cloud servers and flexible infrastructure, UpCloud remains an attractive option.
Storage
Both providers offer storage products for application data.
These can be used for:
- Databases
- Application files
- Media
- Backups
- Static assets
The right platform depends on storage performance, capacity, region, and pricing.
Kubernetes
UpCloud provides Kubernetes infrastructure.
Hetzner can also be used to run Kubernetes clusters.
The main difference is operational responsibility.
A managed Kubernetes environment can reduce maintenance.
A self-managed cluster can provide more control but requires additional DevOps work.
Data Transfer
Network traffic can become an important factor for applications that serve large amounts of data.
This includes:
- Media applications
- File platforms
- APIs
- Backup systems
- High-traffic websites
UpCloud’s current fair-transfer policy can be particularly relevant for workloads with significant outbound traffic.
Hetzner also provides generous network allowances on many products, but the exact limits and terms depend on the product.
Always verify current provider terms before making a purchasing decision.
European Infrastructure
Both providers have strong European infrastructure.
Hetzner has a particularly strong presence in Germany and Europe.
UpCloud also operates several European locations.
If most of your users are in Europe, both can be worth considering.
Choose the location that gives your users good latency and satisfies your data requirements.
Security
Both providers offer infrastructure security controls.
Customers still need to manage:
- Firewall configuration
- SSH keys
- System updates
- Database security
- Secrets
- Backups
- Application vulnerabilities
Good server administration remains essential.
Hetzner vs UpCloud for Startups
Hetzner can be an excellent choice for startups that want strong infrastructure value and potentially dedicated resources later.
UpCloud can be attractive for startups that prefer a focused cloud-server environment and predictable infrastructure management.
Both can handle many conventional SaaS workloads.
Pros and Cons
Hetzner
Pros
- Strong infrastructure value
- Excellent dedicated server options
- Direct control
- Strong European presence
- Good for self-managed workloads
Cons
- More infrastructure responsibility
- Smaller managed-service ecosystem
- Some workloads may require more manual management
UpCloud
Pros
- Focused cloud infrastructure
- Performance-oriented platform
- Cloud servers and storage
- Predictable infrastructure approach
- Useful Kubernetes options
Cons
- Smaller ecosystem
- Fewer specialized managed services
- Dedicated infrastructure options are more limited
Which One Should You Choose?
Choose Hetzner if you want cloud or dedicated servers, strong infrastructure value, and direct control.
Choose UpCloud if you prefer a focused cloud infrastructure platform with an emphasis on cloud servers, storage, and predictable infrastructure.
Final Verdict
Hetzner is particularly strong for infrastructure-heavy workloads and dedicated servers.
UpCloud is attractive for cloud-server, storage, and performance-focused deployments.
For developers who want maximum infrastructure flexibility, Hetzner is a strong option.
For developers who want a focused cloud infrastructure platform, UpCloud can be an excellent alternative.